Comment on: "The Frenkel Line: a direct experimental evidence for the new thermodynamic boundary"
V.V. Brazhkin, J.E. Proctor

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent claim of experimental evidence for the Frenkel line in supercritical argon, arguing that the reported observations are due to experimental path irregularities rather than a true structural transition.
Contribution
It clarifies that the previous experimental results do not constitute evidence for the Frenkel line, emphasizing the importance of experimental path control in such studies.
Findings
No direct experimental evidence of structural transformation was found.
Reported observations are attributed to irregular experimental paths.
The paper questions the validity of previous claims regarding the Frenkel line.
Abstract
In a recent publication (D. Bolmatov et al. Sci.Rep. 5, 15850 (2015)) the experimental observation of structural transformations on crossing the Frenkel line in supercritical argon is claimed. Here we show that no experimental evidence of the structural transformation was presented. The reported experimental observations which Bolmatov et al. claim as evidence of a transition across the Frenkel line are instead due to the irregularity of the experimental (P,T) path in their work.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-pressure geophysics and materials · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
