On the Aliphatic versus Aromatic Content of the Carriers of the "Unidentified" Infrared Emission Features
Xuejuan Yang, Rainer Glaser, Aigen Li, Jianxin Zhong

TL;DR
This study investigates the aromatic versus aliphatic composition of carriers responsible for the unidentified infrared emission features, using theoretical calculations to determine the aliphatic fraction and confirm their predominantly aromatic nature.
Contribution
The paper provides the first quantitative estimate of the aliphatic content in UIE carriers by comparing observed spectral ratios with computed oscillator strengths, confirming their mostly aromatic composition.
Findings
Aliphatic fraction in UIE carriers is at most ~10%.
The 6.85 micrometer feature is more prominent than the 7.25 micrometer feature due to intrinsic strength differences.
UIE carriers are predominantly aromatic hydrocarbons.
Abstract
Although it is generally accepted that the so-called "unidentified" infrared emission (UIE) features at 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and 11.3 micrometer are characteristic of the stretching and bending vibrations of aromatic hydrocarbon materials, the exact nature of their carriers remains unknown: whether they are free-flying, predominantly aromatic gas-phase molecules, or amorphous solids with a mixed aromatic/aliphatic composition are being debated. Recently, the 3.3 and 3.4 micrometer features which are commonly respectively attributed to aromatic and aliphatic C-H stretches have been used to place an upper limit of ~2\% on the aliphatic fraction of the UIE carriers (i.e. the number of C atoms in aliphatic chains to that in aromatic rings). Here we further explore the aliphatic versus aromatic content of the UIE carriers by examining the ratio of the observed intensity of the 6.2 micrometer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
