Asteroseismology of 1523 misclassified red giants using $\textit{Kepler}$ data
Jie Yu, Daniel Huber, Timothy R. Bedding, Dennis Stello, Simon J., Murphy, Maosheng Xiang, Shaolan Bi, Tanda Li

TL;DR
This study reclassified 1523 Kepler red giants, discovering 626 new oscillators, and improved methods for analyzing oscillations near the Nyquist frequency, enhancing understanding of low-luminosity red giants.
Contribution
It presents a novel classification scheme and analysis of misclassified red giants, increasing the known sample and refining oscillation detection methods near the Nyquist frequency.
Findings
26% increase in known oscillating low-luminosity red giants
Identification of 47 super-Nyquist oscillators
Misclassification mainly due to uncertainties in surface gravity
Abstract
We analysed solar-like oscillations in 1523 red giants which have previously been misclassified as subgiants, with predicted values (based on the Kepler Input Catalogue) between 280Hz to 700Hz. We report the discovery of 626 new oscillating red giants in our sample, in addition to 897 oscillators that were previously characterized by Hekker et al. (2011) from one quarter of data. Our sample increases the known number of oscillating low-luminosity red giants by (up to 1900 stars). About three quarters of our sample are classified as ascending red-giant-branch stars, while the remainder are red-clump stars. A novel scheme was applied to determine for 108 stars with close to the Nyquist frequency (240Hz < < 320Hz). Additionally, we identified 47 stars…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
