Sufficient conditions for a linear operator on $\mathbb{R}[x]$ to be monotone
Leah Buck, Kelly Emmrich, Tam\'as Forg\'acs

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between hyperbolicity preservation and monotonicity in infinite order differential operators on real polynomials, providing counterexamples and sufficient conditions for monotonicity.
Contribution
It disproves the conjecture that hyperbolicity preserver implies monotonicity and offers new criteria for monotonicity in these operators.
Findings
Hyperbolicity preservation does not imply monotonicity.
Counterexamples to the conjecture are provided.
Sufficient conditions for monotonicity are established.
Abstract
We demonstrate that being a hyperbolicity preserver does not imply monotonicity for infinite order differential operators on , thereby settling a recent conjecture in the negative. We also give some sufficient conditions for such operators to be monotone.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics · Differential Equations and Boundary Problems · Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research
