A Simulation Study on the Feasibility of Radio Enhancement Therapy with Calcium Tungstate and Hafnium Oxide Nanoparticles
Nicholas J. Sherck, You-Yeon Won

TL;DR
This simulation study compares calcium tungstate and hafnium oxide nanoparticles to gold nanoparticles for radio enhancement therapy, revealing HfO2's similar function to gold and proposing CaWO4's potential via UV luminescence.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative in-silico analysis of novel CaWO4 and HfO2 nanoparticles for radio enhancement, expanding beyond gold standards.
Findings
HfO2 likely functions similarly to gold in radio enhancement.
CaWO4 probably does not function like gold but may kill cancer cells via UV luminescence.
HfO2 is less effective than gold but still comparable.
Abstract
Herein is a simulation study on the radio enhancement potential of calcium tungstate (CaWO4) and hafnium oxide (HfO2) nanoparticles (NPs) relative to gold (Au) NPs. The work utilizes the extensively studied Au NP as the "gold standard" to which the novel materials can be compared. All three materials were investigated in-silico with the software Penetration and Energy Loss of Positrons and Electrons (PENELOPE) developed by Francesc Salvat and distributed in the United States by the Radiation Safety Information Computational Center (RSICC) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The aims are: (1) Do CaWO4 and HfO2 NPs function like Au?, and (2) if not, how else might they function to enhance radio therapy? Our investigations have found that HfO2 likely functions as Au, but not as effectively. CaWO4 likely does not function as Au, and we propose that CaWO4 may exhibit cancer killing traits…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
