Testing core creation in hydrodynamical simulations using the HI kinematics of field dwarfs

TL;DR

This study evaluates whether hydrodynamical simulations that create cores in low-mass halos can match observed HI kinematics of dwarf galaxies, highlighting the importance of broad observational testing for cosmological models.

Contribution

It demonstrates that core creation in simulations aligns with small-radius dwarf galaxy kinematics but fails at larger radii, emphasizing the need for comprehensive observational validation.

Findings

Core creation reproduces small-radius dwarf kinematics.

Discrepancy between simulations and observations at larger radii.

Highlights importance of broad observational testing.

Abstract

The majority of recent hydrodynamical simulations indicate the creation of central cores in the mass profiles of low-mass halos, a process that is attributed to star formation-related baryonic feedback. Core creation is regarded as one of the most promising solutions to potential issues faced by the lambda cold dark matter (LambdaCDM) cosmology on small scales. For example, the reduced dynamical mass enclosed by cores can explain the low rotational velocities measured for nearby dwarf galaxies, thus possibly lifting the seeming contradiction with the LambdaCDM expectations (the so-called "too big to fail" problem). Here we test core creation as a solution of cosmological issues by using a sample of dwarfs with measurements of their atomic hydrogen (HI) kinematics extending to large radii. Using the NIHAO hydrodynamical simulation as an example, we show that core creation can successfully reproduce the kinematics of dwarfs with small kinematic radii, R <~ 1.5 kpc. However, the agreement with observations becomes poor once galaxies with kinematic measurements extending beyond the core region, R ~ 1.5 - 4 kpc, are considered. This result illustrates the importance of testing the predictions of hydrodynamical simulations that are relevant for cosmology against a broad range of observational samples. We would like to stress that our result is valid only under the following set of assumptions: i) that our sample of dwarfs with HI kinematics is representative of the overall population of field dwarfs, ii) that there are no severe measurement biases in the observational parameters of our HI dwarfs (e.g., related to inclination estimates), and iii) that the HI velocity fields of dwarfs are regular enough to allow the recovery of the true enclosed dynamical mass.