Mediation Analysis for Censored Survival Data under an Accelerated Failure Time Model
Isabel R. Fulcher, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, Paige L. Williams

TL;DR
This paper investigates the differences between the 'difference' and 'product' methods for causal mediation analysis in censored survival data under AFT models, revealing conditions under which they produce biased or consistent estimates.
Contribution
It formally demonstrates that the two methods may diverge in estimates under censoring and model misspecification, providing guidance on their valid application in survival analysis.
Findings
The product method remains valid under independent censoring.
The difference method can be biased with non-collapsible error distributions.
Both methods are consistent in normal mediator-normal outcome cases.
Abstract
Recent advances in causal mediation analysis have formalized conditions for estimating direct and indirect effects in various contexts. These approaches have been extended to a number of models for survival outcomes including accelerated failure time (AFT) models which are widely used in a broad range of health applications given their intuitive interpretation. In this setting, it has been suggested that under standard assumptions, the "difference" and "product" methods produce equivalent estimates of the indirect effect of exposure on the survival outcome. We formally show that these two methods may produce substantially different estimates in the presence of censoring or truncation, due to a form of model misspecification. Specifically, we establish that while the product method remains valid under standard assumptions in the presence of independent censoring, the difference method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
