Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities
Darko Cherepnalkoski, Andreas Karpf, Igor Mozetic, Miha Grcar

TL;DR
This paper investigates cohesion and coalition formation among European Parliament members by analyzing both their voting records and Twitter retweeting behavior, revealing insights into political alignment and cross-platform correlations.
Contribution
It introduces a dual-method approach combining Krippendorff's Alpha and Exponential Random Graph Models to compare co-voting and retweeting patterns across policy areas.
Findings
Retweeting behavior correlates with co-voting patterns in some policy areas.
Different policy areas show varying coalition structures.
Twitter data provides complementary insights to traditional voting analysis.
Abstract
We study the cohesion within and the coalitions between political groups in the Eighth European Parliament (2014--2019) by analyzing two entirely different aspects of the behavior of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) in the policy-making processes. On one hand, we analyze their co-voting patterns and, on the other, their retweeting behavior. We make use of two diverse datasets in the analysis. The first one is the roll-call vote dataset, where cohesion is regarded as the tendency to co-vote within a group, and a coalition is formed when the members of several groups exhibit a high degree of co-voting agreement on a subject. The second dataset comes from Twitter; it captures the retweeting (i.e., endorsing) behavior of the MEPs and implies cohesion (retweets within the same group) and coalitions (retweets between groups) from a completely different perspective. We employ…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
