How polarizabilities and $C_6$ coefficients actually vary with atomic volume
Tim Gould

TL;DR
This study reveals how atomic $C_6$ coefficients and polarizabilities scale with volume across elements, showing that their exponents vary significantly with atomic number and are related in an unexpected way.
Contribution
It provides a new empirical scaling law for $C_6$ and polarizability with volume, challenging standard assumptions and demonstrating their dependence on atomic number.
Findings
Scaling exponents vary with element number $Z$
Polarizability and $C_6$ exponents are related by $p' \\approx p - 0.615$
Results are consistent across different confining potentials
Abstract
In this work we investigate how atomic coefficients and static dipole polarizabilities scale with effective volume. We show, using confined atoms covering rows 1-5 of the periodic table, that and (for volume ) where , and are the reference values and effective volume of the free atom. The scaling exponents and vary substantially as a function of element number , in contrast to the standard "rule of thumb" that and . Remarkably, We find that the polarizability and exponents and are related by rather than the expected . Results are largely independent of the form of the confining potential (harmonic, cubic and quartic potentials are considered) and kernel…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
