Security and Performance Comparison of Different Secure Channel Protocols for Avionics Wireless Networks
Raja Naeem Akram, Konstantinos Markantonakis, Keith Mayes,, Pierre-Francois Bonnefoi, Damien Sauveron, Serge Chaumette

TL;DR
This paper compares the security and performance of three secure channel protocols for avionics wireless networks, evaluating their effectiveness in meeting stringent safety and reliability standards.
Contribution
It introduces three approaches and multiple protocol variants for establishing secure channels in AWNs, with implementation and performance comparison.
Findings
Protocols meet security and operational requirements
Performance varies among different approaches
Guidelines for selecting protocols based on security needs
Abstract
The notion of Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) refers to inter-connected pieces of avionics equipment supported by a wired technology, with stringent reliability and safety requirements. If the inter-connecting wires are physically secured so that a malicious user cannot access them directly, then this enforces (at least partially) the security of the network. However, substituting the wired network with a wireless network - which in this context is referred to as an Avionics Wireless Network (AWN) - brings a number of new challenges related to assurance, reliability, and security. The AWN thus has to ensure that it provides at least the required security and safety levels offered by the equivalent wired network. Providing a wired-equivalent security for a communication channel requires the setting up of a strong, secure (encrypted) channel between the entities that are connected to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
