Undecidability of the Lambek calculus with subexponential and bracket modalities
Max Kanovich, Stepan Kuznetsov, Andre Scedrov

TL;DR
This paper proves that the derivability problem in an extended Lambek calculus with subexponential and bracket modalities is undecidable, highlighting limits of computational tractability in advanced linguistic formalisms.
Contribution
It establishes the undecidability of the Lambek calculus with exponential and bracket modalities, and analyzes the complexity of its restricted fragments.
Findings
Undecidability of the calculus with these modalities.
Restricted fragments are in NP complexity class.
Insights into the computational limits of linguistic formalisms.
Abstract
The Lambek calculus is a well-known logical formalism for modelling natural language syntax. The original calculus covered a substantial number of intricate natural language phenomena, but only those restricted to the context-free setting. In order to address more subtle linguistic issues, the Lambek calculus has been extended in various ways. In particular, Morrill and Valentin (2015) introduce an extension with so-called exponential and bracket modalities. Their extension is based on a non-standard contraction rule for the exponential that interacts with the bracket structure in an intricate way. The standard contraction rule is not admissible in this calculus. In this paper we prove undecidability of the derivability problem in their calculus. We also investigate restricted decidable fragments considered by Morrill and Valentin and we show that these fragments belong to the NP class.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
