The Age and Distance of the Kepler Open Cluster NGC 6811 from an Eclipsing Binary, Turnoff Star Pulsation, and Giant Asteroseismology
Eric L. Sandquist (San Diego State University), J. Jessen-Hansen, (Aarhus University), Matthew D. Shetrone (McDonald Observatory), Karsten, Brogaard (Aarhus University), Soren Meibom (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for, Astrophysics), Marika Leitner (Humboldt State University)

TL;DR
This study combines binary star analysis, pulsation data, and asteroseismology to refine the age and distance of the open cluster NGC 6811, revealing detailed stellar properties and pulsation characteristics.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of stellar parameters and cluster age using eclipsing binaries, pulsations, and asteroseismology, improving previous estimates and understanding of stellar evolution in NGC 6811.
Findings
Masses of cluster stars are larger than predicted by isochrones.
Identified 28 δ Sct, 15 γ Dor, and 5 hybrid pulsators near the turnoff.
Derived a cluster distance modulus of 10.37, slightly larger than previous estimates.
Abstract
We present the analysis of an eccentric, partially eclipsing long-period ( d) binary system KIC 9777062 that contains main sequence stars near the turnoff of the intermediate age open cluster NGC 6811. The primary is a metal-lined Am star with a possible convective blueshift to its radial velocities, and one star (probably the secondary) is likely to be a Dor pulsator. The component masses are (stat.)(sys.) and , and the radii are and . The isochrone ages of the stars are mildly inconsistent: the age from the mass-radius combination for the primary ( Gyr, where the last quote was systematic uncertainty from models and metallicity) is smaller than that from the secondary ( Gyr) and is consistent with the inference from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
