Major mergers are not significant drivers of star formation or morphological transformation around the epoch of peak cosmic star formation
E. K. Lofthouse, S. Kaviraj, C. J. Conselice, A. Mortlock, W. Hartley

TL;DR
This study finds that major mergers contribute minimally to star formation and morphological changes in massive galaxies around the peak epoch of cosmic star formation, suggesting other processes are more influential.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence that major mergers are not the primary drivers of galaxy evolution at z~2, challenging previous assumptions.
Findings
Only 21% of blue spheroids show disturbance features.
Major mergers account for about 3% of star formation activity.
Major mergers are not the dominant mechanism for spheroid formation at z~2.
Abstract
We investigate the contribution of major mergers (mass ratios ) to stellar mass growth and morphological transformations around the epoch of peak cosmic star formation (). We visually classify a complete sample of massive (M 10M) galaxies at this epoch, drawn from the CANDELS survey, into late-type galaxies, major mergers, spheroids and disturbed spheroids which show morphological disturbances. Given recent simulation work, which indicates that recent (0.3-0.4 Gyr) major-merger remnants exhibit clear tidal features in such images, we use the fraction of disturbed spheroids to probe the role of major mergers in driving morphological transformations. The percentage of blue spheroids (i.e. with ongoing star formation) that show morphological disturbances is only 21 4%, indicating that major mergers are not the dominant mechanism for spheroid…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
