Computational Limitations of First-Order Repressor Systems
Emma Wentworth, John Wentworth

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that first-order repressor systems in synthetic biology are fundamentally limited, unable to support bistability or memory, due to inherent signal degradation measured by a new function G.
Contribution
The study proves the impossibility of bistability in first-order repressor systems and introduces the function G to quantify signal quality, offering new insights into biological part limitations.
Findings
First-order repressors cannot support bistability.
Signal quality G always decreases in feedback and cascades.
G can serve as a new metric for biological part characterization.
Abstract
Almost all current approaches for engineering modular logic components in synthetic biology use first-order regulators, including most CRISPR/CAS, TAL, zinc finger, and RNA interference systems. Many practitioners understand intuitively that second and higher order binding is necessary for scalability, and this is easy to show for single-input single-output systems. However, no study to date has analysed whether a more complex system, utilizing e.g. feedback or error correction, can produce scalable computation from first-order regulators. We prove here that first order repressor systems cannot support bistability. In the process, we introduce a function G to measure signal quality in molecular systems, and we show that G always decreases in dynamic feedback systems as well as static feed-forward logic cascades of first-order repressors. As a result, first order repressors cannot build…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGene Regulatory Network Analysis · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
