Universal Simulation of Directed Systems in the abstract Tile Assembly Model Requires Undirectedness
Jacob Hendricks, Matthew J. Patitz, Trent A. Rogers

TL;DR
This paper proves that a universal simulator for directed self-assembling systems in the abstract Tile Assembly Model cannot be both universal and always directed, highlighting the essential nondeterminism in self-assembly processes.
Contribution
It demonstrates that directed systems in the aTAM are not intrinsically universal, establishing the fundamental nondeterminism in self-assembly.
Findings
Directed systems cannot be universally simulated by always directed systems.
Nondeterminism is essential for universality in self-assembly.
New techniques for designing systems with disjoint computational powers.
Abstract
As a mathematical model of self-assembling systems, Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM) is a remarkable platform for studying the behaviors and powers of self-assembling systems. Capable of Turing universal computation, the aTAM allows algorithmic self-assembly, in which the components can be designed so that the rules governing their behaviors force them to inherently execute prescribed algorithms as they combine. Adding to its completeness, the aTAM was shown to also be intrinsically universal, which means that there exists a single tile set such that for any arbitrary input aTAM system, that tile set can be configured into a seed structure which will then cause self-assembly using that tile set to simulate the input system, capturing its full dynamics modulo only a scale factor. However, the universal simulator previously given makes use of nondeterminism in terms of tile…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
