A comparison of the innate flexibilities of six chains in F$_1$-ATPase with identical secondary and tertiary folds; 3 active enzymes and 3 structural proteins
Monique M. Tirion

TL;DR
This study compares the flexibility of six chains in F$_1$-ATPase, revealing differences in mobility and structural features that explain the catalytic activity of $eta$ subunits versus $ ext{alpha}$ subunits.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the internal flexibility and structural differences between $ ext{alpha}$ and $eta$ subunits, highlighting factors influencing their functional divergence.
Findings
$eta$ subunits exhibit higher torso mobility than $ ext{alpha}$ subunits.
A specific loop in $eta$ subunits influences nucleotide binding region occlusion.
Soft eigenmodes correlate with conformational changes in $eta$ subunits.
Abstract
The and subunits comprising the hexameric assembly of F1-ATPase share a high degree of structural identity, though low primary identity. Each subunit binds nucleotide in similar pockets, yet only subunits are catalytically active. Why? We re-examine their internal symmetry axes and observe interesting differences. Dividing each chain into an N-terminal head region, a C-terminal foot region, and a central torso, we observe (1) that while the foot and head regions in all chains obtain high and similar mobility, the torsos obtain different mobility profiles, with the subunits exhibiting a higher motility compared to the subunits, a trend supported by the crystallographic B-factors. The subunits have greater torso mobility by having fewer distributed, nonlocal packing interactions providing a spacious and soft connectivity, and offsetting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
