Estimating scaled treatment effects with multiple outcomes
Edward H. Kennedy, Shreya Kangovi, Nandita Mitra

TL;DR
This paper introduces nonparametric methods for estimating and testing scaled treatment effects across multiple outcomes, accommodating covariate effects and applicable to both randomized and observational studies.
Contribution
It proposes novel scaled effect measures and efficient estimation techniques for multiple outcomes, extending analysis capabilities beyond single-outcome studies.
Findings
Methods are doubly robust and nonparametric.
Simulation and data analysis demonstrate effectiveness.
Applicable to high-dimensional covariate settings.
Abstract
In classical study designs, the aim is often to learn about the effects of a treatment or intervention on a single outcome; in many modern studies, however, data on multiple outcomes are collected and it is of interest to explore effects on multiple outcomes simultaneously. Such designs can be particularly useful in patient-centered research, where different outcomes might be more or less important to different patients. In this paper we propose scaled effect measures (via potential outcome notation) that translate effects on multiple outcomes to a common scale, using mean-variance and median-interquartile-range -based standardizations. We present efficient, nonparametric, doubly robust methods for estimating these scaled effects (and weighted average summary measures), and for testing the null hypothesis that treatment affects all outcomes equally. We also discuss methods for exploring…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
