The underlying driver for the \civ Baldwin effect in QSOs with $0<z<5$
Xue Ge, Wei-Hao Bian, Xiao-Lei Jiang, Wen-Shuai Liu, Xiao-Feng Wang, (NJNU)

TL;DR
This study investigates the Baldwin effect in QSOs across a wide redshift range, revealing that the Eddington ratio is the primary driver behind the extciv\ Baldwin effect, rather than SMBH mass.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis across redshifts and introduces an empirical host fraction formula, establishing the Eddington ratio as the key factor influencing the extciv\ Baldwin effect.
Findings
extciv\ EW correlates strongly with the Eddington ratio.
The Baldwin effect is confirmed across $0<z<5$ in the sample.
Eddington ratio is a better predictor than SMBH mass for extciv\
Abstract
Broad emission lines is a prominent property of type I quasi-stellar objects (QSOs). The origin of the Baldwin effect for \civ \AA\ broad emission lines, i.e., the luminosity dependence of the \civ equivalent width (EW), is not clearly established. Using a sample of 87 low- Palomar-Green (PG) QSOs and 126 high- QSOs across the widest possible ranges of redshift (), we consistently calculate \hb-based single-epoch supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass and the Eddington ratio to investigate the underlying driver of the \civ Baldwin effect. An empirical formula to estimate the host fraction in the continuum luminosity at 5100 \AA\ is presented and used in \hb-based \mbh calculation for low- PG QSOs. It is found that, for low- PG QSOs, the Eddington ratio has strong correlations with PC1 and PC2 from the principal component analysis, and \civ EW has a strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
