Inference from the small scales of cosmic shear with current and future Dark Energy Survey data
N. MacCrann, J. Aleksi\'c, A. Amara, S. L. Bridle, C. Bruderer, C., Chang, S. Dodelson, T. F. Eifler, E. M. Huff, D. Huterer, T. Kacprzak, A., Refregier, E. Suchyta, R. H. Wechsler, J. Zuntz, T. M. C. Abbott, S. Allam,, J. Annis, R. Armstrong, A. Benoit-L\'evy, D. Brooks

TL;DR
This paper analyzes small-scale cosmic shear data from the Dark Energy Survey to assess its potential for constraining baryonic physics, highlighting systematic challenges and future prospects.
Contribution
It extends cosmic shear analysis to smaller scales, evaluates baryonic feedback models, and discusses systematic effects impacting interpretation.
Findings
DES SV data limited but promising for baryonic feedback constraints
Systematic effects like intrinsic alignment and shape measurement biases are significant
Future datasets can differentiate feedback scenarios with improved modeling
Abstract
Cosmic shear is sensitive to fluctuations in the cosmological matter density field, including on small physical scales, where matter clustering is affected by baryonic physics in galaxies and galaxy clusters, such as star formation, supernovae feedback and AGN feedback. While muddying any cosmological information that is contained in small scale cosmic shear measurements, this does mean that cosmic shear has the potential to constrain baryonic physics and galaxy formation. We perform an analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) cosmic shear measurements, now extended to smaller scales, and using the Mead et al. 2015 halo model to account for baryonic feedback. While the SV data has limited statistical power, we demonstrate using a simulated likelihood analysis that the final DES data will have the statistical power to differentiate among baryonic feedback…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
