Saliency Integration: An Arbitrator Model
Yingyue Xu, Xiaopeng Hong, Fatih Porikli, Xin Liu, Jie Chen, and, Guoying Zhao

TL;DR
This paper introduces an arbitrator model for saliency integration that combines multiple models and external knowledge, estimating model expertise without ground truth to improve saliency map accuracy.
Contribution
The proposed arbitrator model effectively integrates multiple saliency models using a Bayesian framework and online expertise estimation, addressing previous challenges.
Findings
Significant performance improvement over existing methods
Effective integration across traditional and deep learning models
Robustness across multiple datasets
Abstract
Saliency integration has attracted much attention on unifying saliency maps from multiple saliency models. Previous offline integration methods usually face two challenges: 1. if most of the candidate saliency models misjudge the saliency on an image, the integration result will lean heavily on those inferior candidate models; 2. an unawareness of the ground truth saliency labels brings difficulty in estimating the expertise of each candidate model. To address these problems, in this paper, we propose an arbitrator model (AM) for saliency integration. Firstly, we incorporate the consensus of multiple saliency models and the external knowledge into a reference map to effectively rectify the misleading by candidate models. Secondly, our quest for ways of estimating the expertise of the saliency models without ground truth labels gives rise to two distinct online model-expertise estimation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
