Anomalous Double-Mode RR Lyrae Stars in the Magellanic Clouds
I. Soszy\'nski, R. Smolec, W. A. Dziembowski, A. Udalski, M. K., Szyma\'nski, L. Wyrzykowski, K. Ulaczyk, R. Poleski, P. Pietrukowicz, S., Kozlowski, D. Skowron, J. Skowron, P. Mr\'oz, M. Pawlak

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of a new subclass of double-mode RR Lyrae stars in the Magellanic Clouds with distinct properties, including different period ratios, amplitude behaviors, and possible origins involving stellar interactions.
Contribution
The study identifies and characterizes a new subclass of anomalous double-mode RR Lyrae stars with unique pulsation and chemical properties, expanding understanding of stellar variability.
Findings
22 anomalous RRd stars identified in the Magellanic Clouds.
Anomalous stars have lower period ratios (0.725-0.738) than classical RRd stars.
Most anomalous stars show long-term amplitude modulations.
Abstract
We report the discovery of a new subclass of double-mode RR Lyrae stars in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds. The sample of 22 pulsating stars have been extracted from the latest edition of the OGLE collection of RR Lyrae variables in the Magellanic System. The stars pulsating simultaneously in the fundamental (F) and first-overtone (1O) modes have distinctly different properties than regular double-mode RR Lyrae variables (RRd stars). The period ratios of our anomalous RRd stars are within a range 0.725-0.738, while "classical" double-mode RR Lyrae variables have period ratios in the range 0.742-0.748. In contrast to the typical RRd stars, in the majority of the anomalous pulsators the F-mode amplitudes are higher than the 1O-mode amplitudes. The light curves associated with the F-mode in the anomalous RRd stars show different morphology than the light curves of, both,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
