Vetting Galactic Leavitt Law Calibrators using Radial Velocities: On the Variability, Binarity, and Possible Parallax Error of 19 Long-period Cepheids
R. I. Anderson, S. Casertano, A. G. Riess, C. Melis, B. Holl, T., Semaan, P. I. Papics, S. Blanco-Cuaresma, L. Eyer, N. Mowlavi, L. Palaversa,, M. Roelens

TL;DR
This study assesses the radial velocity variability and binarity of 19 long-period Cepheids to evaluate potential parallax errors in their use as Galactic distance calibrators, finding minimal orbital influence for most and identifying new binary candidates.
Contribution
It provides the first extensive RV analysis of these Cepheids, constrains orbital configurations affecting parallax measurements, and discovers new binary systems impacting distance scale calibrations.
Findings
Orbital motion induces less than 2% parallax error for most stars.
Identified new spectroscopic binaries XZ Car and CD Cyg.
Improved orbital parameters for YZ Carinae.
Abstract
We investigate the radial velocity (RV) variability and spectroscopic binarity of 19 Galactic long-period ( d) classical Cepheid variable stars whose trigonometric parallaxes are being measured using the Hubble Space Telescope and Gaia. Our primary objective is to constrain possible parallax error due to undetected orbital motion. Using high-precision RVs measured between 2011 and 2016, we find no indication of orbital motion on yr timescales for 18 Cepheids and determine upper limits on allowed configurations for a range of input orbital periods. The results constrain the unsigned parallax error due to orbital motion to for 16 stars, and for 18. We improve the orbital solution of the known binary YZ Carinae and show that the astrometric model must take into account orbital motion to avoid significant error ($\sim \pm 100…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
