Connecting the dots: a correlation between ionising radiation and cloud mass-loss rate traced by optical integral field spectroscopy
A. F. McLeod, M. Gritschneder, J. E. Dale, A. Ginsburg, P. D., Klaassen, J. C. Mottram, T. Preibisch, S. Ramsay, M. Reiter, L. Testi

TL;DR
This study uses optical spectroscopy to analyze how ionising radiation from massive stars influences the mass-loss rates of pillar-like structures in star-forming regions, revealing empirical correlations and confirming theoretical models.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical quantification of the relationship between ionising photon flux and pillar mass-loss rates across multiple star-forming regions.
Findings
Strong correlation between ionising photon flux and electron density.
Mass-loss rate scales with the square root of ionising photon flux.
Empirical data supports theoretical models of photo-evaporation.
Abstract
We present an analysis of the effect of feedback from O- and B-type stars with data from the integral field spectrograph MUSE mounted on the Very Large Telescope of pillar-like structures in the Carina Nebular Complex, one of the most massive star-forming regions in the Galaxy. For the observed pillars, we compute gas electron densities and temperatures maps, produce integrated line and velocity maps of the ionised gas, study the ionisation fronts at the pillar tips, analyse the properties of the single regions, and detect two ionised jets originating from two distinct pillar tips. For each pillar tip we determine the incident ionising photon flux originating from the nearby massive O- and B-type stars and compute the mass-loss rate of the pillar tips due to photo-evaporation caused by the incident ionising radiation. We combine the results of the Carina…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
