Robust covariance estimation of galaxy-galaxy weak lensing: validation and limitation of jackknife covariance
Masato Shirasaki, Masahiro Takada, Hironao Miyatake, Ryuichi, Takahashi, Takashi Hamana, Takahiro Nishimichi, Ryoma Murata

TL;DR
This paper develops a simulation-based method to evaluate the error covariance in galaxy-galaxy weak lensing, compares it with the traditional jackknife method, and discusses the limitations of jackknife covariance estimation.
Contribution
The study introduces a simulation approach for covariance estimation and assesses the accuracy and limitations of the jackknife method in galaxy-galaxy weak lensing analysis.
Findings
Jackknife covariance varies across mock realizations.
Average jackknife covariance approximates true covariance up to certain scales.
Jackknife underestimates covariance at large scales, especially in denser surveys.
Abstract
We develop a method to simulate galaxy-galaxy weak lensing by utilizing all-sky, light-cone simulations and their inherent halo catalogs. Using the mock catalog to study the error covariance matrix of galaxy-galaxy weak lensing, we compare the full covariance with the "jackknife" (JK) covariance, the method often used in the literature that estimates the covariance from the resamples of the data itself. We show that there exists the variation of JK covariance over realizations of mock lensing measurements, while the average JK covariance over mocks can give a reasonably accurate estimation of the true covariance up to separations comparable with the size of JK subregion. The scatter in JK covariances is found to be after we subtract the lensing measurement around random points. However, the JK method tends to underestimate the covariance at the larger separations, more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
