Interactional Expertise and Embodiment
Harry Collins

TL;DR
This paper explores how interactional expertise influences philosophical views on embodiment, emphasizing socialization and language's roles over bodily practice in shaping our conceptual understanding.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of interactional expertise and argues for its central role in philosophical theories of embodiment and socialization.
Findings
Interactional expertise is crucial for understanding social cognition.
Language plays a more significant role than bodily practice in conceptual development.
Disembodied socialized agents are philosophically problematic.
Abstract
In Part 1 of this paper, I introduce the idea of interactional expertise while in Part 2, I focus on its implications for philosophical theories of the importance of the body in forming our conceptual world. I argue that the way philosophers have dealt with the body turns attention away from the most important questions and that we cannot answer these questions without making the notion of socialisation, and therefore interactional expertise, a central concept in our thinking. This makes language at least as important, and often more important than bodily practice in our understanding of the world. The notion of a disembodied socialised agent leads in the direction of interesting questions while the notion of an embodied but unsocialised human actor is unimaginable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmpathy and Medical Education · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
