"Open Innovation" and "Triple Helix" Models of Innovation: Can Synergy in Innovation Systems Be Measured?
Loet Leydesdorff, Inga Ivanova

TL;DR
This paper compares 'Open Innovation' and 'Triple Helix' models, proposing a measure of synergy in innovation systems through redundancy, which reflects unrealized options and enhances system innovativeness.
Contribution
It introduces the Triple Helix indicator as a measure of unrealized options and synergy, linking feedback dynamics to innovation system viability.
Findings
Redundancy correlates with increased innovation capacity.
Feedback loops can evolve into feedforward mechanisms for self-organization.
Higher redundancy enhances system synergy and reduces uncertainty.
Abstract
The model of "Open Innovations" (OI) can be compared with the "Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations" (TH) as attempts to find surplus value in bringing industrial innovation closer to public R&D. Whereas the firm is central in the model of OI, the TH adds multi-centeredness: in addition to firms, universities and (e.g., regional) governments can take leading roles in innovation eco-systems. In addition to the (transversal) technology transfer at each moment of time, one can focus on the dynamics in the feedback loops. Under specifiable conditions, feedback loops can be turned into feedforward ones that drive innovation eco-systems towards self-organization and the auto-catalytic generation of new options. The generation of options can be more important than historical realizations ("best practices") for the longer-term viability of knowledge-based innovation systems.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
