Observation and Characterization of a Cosmic Muon Neutrino Flux from the Northern Hemisphere using six years of IceCube data
IceCube Collaboration: M. G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J., Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, K. Andeen, T., Anderson, I. Ansseau, G. Anton, M. Archinger, C. Arg\"uelles, J. Auffenberg,, S. Axani, X. Bai, S. W. Barwick, V. Baum, R. Bay, J. J. Beatty

TL;DR
This paper reports the detection of a high-energy astrophysical muon neutrino flux from the Northern Hemisphere using six years of IceCube data, revealing a harder spectrum and the highest energy neutrino event to date.
Contribution
It presents a new measurement of astrophysical muon neutrinos using an extended dataset and a likelihood approach, providing improved spectral constraints and insights into the neutrino flux spectrum.
Findings
Significant astrophysical neutrino flux observed at energies 191 TeV to 8.3 PeV.
The spectrum follows an unbroken power law with a hard spectral index of 2.13.
The highest energy neutrino event has a reconstructed energy of 4.5 PeV, unlikely to be atmospheric.
Abstract
The IceCube Collaboration has previously discovered a high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux using neutrino events with interaction vertices contained within the instrumented volume of the IceCube detector. We present a complementary measurement using charged current muon neutrino events where the interaction vertex can be outside this volume. As a consequence of the large muon range the effective area is significantly larger but the field of view is restricted to the Northern Hemisphere. IceCube data from 2009 through 2015 have been analyzed using a likelihood approach based on the reconstructed muon energy and zenith angle. At the highest neutrino energies between 191 TeV and 8.3 PeV a significant astrophysical contribution is observed, excluding a purely atmospheric origin of these events at significance. The data are well described by an isotropic, unbroken power law…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
