Room evacuation through two contiguous exits
I.M.Sticco, G.A.Frank, C.O.Dorso

TL;DR
This study examines how the separation distance between two contiguous exits affects evacuation efficiency, revealing that certain distances do not improve and may even hinder evacuation times, contrary to common assumptions.
Contribution
It investigates the impact of door separation distance on evacuation performance, highlighting a previously overlooked factor influencing pedestrian dynamics.
Findings
Certain separation distances do not improve evacuation times
Close proximity of exits can worsen evacuation performance
Optimal door placement is crucial for efficient evacuation
Abstract
Current regulations demand that at least two exits should be available for a safe evacuation during a panic situation. Although the "faster is slower" effect is expected to take place near the exits, the evacuation time will improve because of the additional exits. However, rooms having contiguous doors not always reduce the leaving time as expected. We investigated the relation between the doors separation and the evacuation performance. We found that there exists a separation distance range that does not really improve the evacuation time, or it can even worsen the process performance. To our knowledge, no attention has been given to this issue in the literature. This work reports how the pedestrians dynamics differ when the separation distance between two exit doors changes and how this affects the overall performance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
