Validation of Information Fusion
Alexander Kott, Wes Milks

TL;DR
This paper proposes a formal, standardized approach to validating information fusion systems by comparing them to recognized standards like human experts, illustrated through the RAID program.
Contribution
It introduces a new formal definition of validation for information fusion systems that separates system properties from external reference standards.
Findings
Validation based on standards improves reliability
RAID program demonstrates practical validation process
Formal validation framework enhances system credibility
Abstract
We motivate and offer a formal definition of validation as it applies to information fusion systems. Common definitions of validation compare the actual state of the world with that derived by the fusion process. This definition conflates properties of the fusion system with properties of systems that intervene between the world and the fusion system. We propose an alternative definition where validation of an information fusion system references a standard fusion device, such as recognized human experts. We illustrate the approach by describing the validation process implemented in RAID, a program conducted by DARPA and focused on information fusion in adversarial, deceptive environments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
