Verification of high-speed solar wind stream forecasts using operational solar wind models
Martin A. Reiss, Manuela Temmer, Astrid M. Veronig, Ljubomir Nikolic,, Susanne Vennerstrom, Florian Schoengassner, and Stefan J. Hofmeister

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of two operational models, ESWF and WSA, in forecasting high-speed solar wind streams impacting Earth, highlighting their strengths and limitations in space weather prediction.
Contribution
The paper provides a comparative assessment of the empirical ESWF and semiempirical WSA models using ACE data, identifying their predictive capabilities and uncertainties in forecasting solar wind streams.
Findings
Both models predict large-scale solar wind features with RMSE ~100 km/s.
ESWF tends to overestimate, WSA tends to underestimate high-speed streams.
Forecast uncertainties include about 1 day in arrival time and 100 km/s in speed.
Abstract
High-speed solar wind streams emanating from coronal holes are frequently impinging on the Earth's magnetosphere causing recurrent, medium-level geomagnetic storm activity. Modeling high-speed solar wind streams is thus an essential element of successful space weather forecasting. Here we evaluate high-speed stream forecasts made by the empirical solar wind forecast (ESWF) and the semiempirical Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA) model based on the in situ plasma measurements from the ACE spacecraft for the years 2011 to 2014. While the ESWF makes use of an empirical relation between the coronal hole area observed in Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) images and solar wind properties at the near-Earth environment, the WSA model establishes a link between properties of the open magnetic field lines extending from the photosphere to the corona and the background solar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
