ALMA spectroscopic survey in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Continuum number counts, resolved 1.2-mm extragalactic background, and properties of the faintest dusty star forming galaxies
M. Aravena, R. Decarli, F. Walter, E. Da Cunha, F. E. Bauer, C. L., Carilli, E. Daddi, D. Elbaz, R. J. Ivison, D. A. Riechers, I. Smail, A. M., Swinbank, A. Weiss, T. Anguita, R. J. Assef, E. Bell, F. Bertoldi, R. Bacon,, R. Bouwens, P. Cortes, P. Cox, J. G\'onzalez-L\'opez

TL;DR
This study uses deep ALMA observations in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field to analyze faint dusty star-forming galaxies, revealing their properties, contribution to the extragalactic background light, and implications for galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed characterization of the galaxies dominating the 1.2-mm extragalactic background light, including their redshift distribution, star formation rates, and molecular gas content.
Findings
Detected nine sources at >3.5σ significance in 1.2-mm map.
Recovered 55% of the EBL at 1.2 mm with individual detections.
Most galaxies have main sequence star formation rates and stellar masses around 10^10 M_sun.
Abstract
We present an analysis of a deep (1=13 Jy) cosmological 1.2-mm continuum map based on ASPECS, the ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. In the 1 arcmin covered by ASPECS we detect nine sources at significance at 1.2-mm. Our ALMA--selected sample has a median redshift of , with only one galaxy detected at z2 within the survey area. This value is significantly lower than that found in millimeter samples selected at a higher flux density cut-off and similar frequencies. Most galaxies have specific star formation rates similar to that of main sequence galaxies at the same epoch, and we find median values of stellar mass and star formation rates of and yr, respectively. Using the dust emission as a tracer for the ISM mass, we derive depletion times that are typically longer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
