Partition function on spheres: how (not) to use zeta function regularization
A. Monin

TL;DR
This paper explores the use of zeta function regularization on spheres, analyzing when formal manipulations yield correct results despite its non-linearity, through various examples.
Contribution
It clarifies the conditions under which zeta function regularization provides correct outcomes despite its inherent non-linearity.
Findings
Formal manipulations can be valid in specific cases
Zeta function regularization is generally non-linear
Examples demonstrate when the method works or fails
Abstract
It is known that not all summation methods are linear and stable. Zeta function regularization is in general non-linear. However, in some cases formal manipulations with "zeta function" regularization (assuming linearity of sums) lead to correct results. We consider several examples and show why this happens.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
