Observational Constraints on First-Star Nucleosynthesis. I. Evidence for Multiple Progenitors of CEMP-no Stars
Jinmi Yoon, Timothy C. Beers, Vinicius M. Placco, Kaitlin C., Rasmussen, Daniela Carollo, Siyu He, Terese T. Hansen, Ian U. Roederer, and, Jeff Zeanah

TL;DR
This study analyzes the distribution of carbon abundance in 305 CEMP stars, revealing bimodal patterns and evidence for multiple progenitors, especially among CEMP-no stars, challenging previous classification criteria.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the bimodal distribution of carbon in CEMP stars and suggests multiple progenitors for CEMP-no stars, improving classification methods.
Findings
Bimodal distribution of $A$(C) with peaks at 7.96 and 6.28.
CEMP-$s$ stars mostly in high-C region; CEMP-no stars in low-C region.
Distinct $A$(C) patterns indicating multiple progenitors for CEMP-no stars.
Abstract
We investigate anew the distribution of absolute carbon abundance, (C) (C), for carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars in the halo of the Milky Way, based on high-resolution spectroscopic data for a total sample of 305 CEMP stars. The sample includes 147 CEMP- (and CEMP-r/s) stars, 127 CEMP-no stars, and 31 CEMP stars that are unclassified, based on the currently employed [Ba/Fe] criterion. We confirm previous claims that the distribution of (C) for CEMP stars is (at least) bimodal, with newly determined peaks centered on (C) (the high-C region) and (C) (the low-C region). A very high fraction of CEMP- (and CEMP-r/s) stars belong to the high-C region, while the great majority of CEMP-no stars reside in the low-C region. However, there exists complexity in the morphology of the (C)-[Fe/H] space for the CEMP-no stars, a first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
