Morphology Dependence Of Stellar Age in Quenched Galaxies at Redshift ~ 1.2: Massive Compact Galaxies Are Older Than More Extended Ones
Christina C. Williams, Mauro Giavalisco, Rachel Bezanson, Nico, Cappelluti, Paolo Cassata, Teng Liu, Bomee Lee, Elena Tundo, Eros Vanzella

TL;DR
This study finds that massive quenched galaxies at redshift ~1.2 with compact morphologies are significantly older than their more extended counterparts, indicating a link between galaxy size and stellar age during quenching.
Contribution
It provides the first consistent evidence of morphology-dependent stellar ages in quenched galaxies at z~1.2 using multiple spectral age indicators and X-ray data.
Findings
Compact quenched galaxies are 0.5-2 Gyr older than normal-sized ones.
Compact galaxies show lower [OII] emission frequency, indicating advanced quenching.
X-ray observations suggest hot gas origin, not AGN, for emission in these galaxies.
Abstract
We report the detection of morphology dependent stellar age in massive quenched galaxies (QGs) at z~1.2. The sense of the dependence is that compact QGs are 0.5-2 Gyr older than normal-sized ones. The evidence comes from three different age indicators, Dn4000, Hdelta and fits to spectral synthesis models, applied to their stacked optical spectra. All age indicators consistently show that the stellar populations of compact QGs are older than their normally-sized counterparts. We detect weak [OII] emission in a fraction of QGs, and the strength of the line, when present, is similar between the two samples; however, compact galaxies exhibit significantly lower frequency of [OII] emission than normal ones. A fraction of both samples are individually detected in 7 Ms Chandra X-ray images (luminosities- erg/sec). 7 Ms stacks of non-detected galaxies show similarly low…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
