Constraints on ultra-high-energy cosmic ray sources from a search for neutrinos above 10 PeV with IceCube
IceCube Collaboration: M. G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J., Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, K. Andeen, T., Anderson, I. Ansseau, G. Anton, M. Archinger, C. Arg\"uelles, J. Auffenberg,, S. Axani, X. Bai, S. W. Barwick, V. Baum, R. Bay, J. J. Beatty

TL;DR
This paper uses seven years of IceCube data to set constraints on the sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, focusing on neutrino detection above 10 PeV, and challenges several astrophysical source models.
Contribution
It provides new limits on cosmogenic neutrino fluxes and UHECR source models, especially constraining sources with strong cosmological evolution and certain astrophysical objects.
Findings
Detected two ultra-high-energy neutrino events with energies above 10^6 GeV.
Rejection of the cosmogenic origin hypothesis for these events at >99% CL.
Constraints disfavor certain active galactic nuclei and pulsar models as UHECR sources.
Abstract
We report constraints on the sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic ray (UHECR) above GeV, based on an analysis of seven years of IceCube data. This analysis efficiently selects very high energy neutrino-induced events which have deposited energies from GeV to above GeV. Two neutrino-induced events with an estimated deposited energy of GeV, the highest neutrino energies observed so far, and GeV were detected. The atmospheric background-only hypothesis of detecting these events is rejected at 3.6. The hypothesis that the observed events are of cosmogenic origin is also rejected at 99% CL because of the limited deposited energy and the non-observation of events at higher energy, while their observation is consistent with an astrophysical origin. Our limits on cosmogenic neutrino fluxes disfavor…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
