The Status of Polycyclic Group-Based Cryptography: A Survey and Open Problems
Jonathan Gryak, Delaram Kahrobaei

TL;DR
This survey reviews the use of polycyclic groups in cryptography, discussing their properties, cryptosystems, cryptanalysis methods, and open problems, including resistance to quantum attacks.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of polycyclic group-based cryptography, highlighting recent developments, cryptanalysis techniques, and unresolved algorithmic challenges.
Findings
Polycyclic groups are suitable for cryptography due to their algorithmic properties.
Various cryptosystems using polycyclic groups have been proposed since 2004.
Cryptanalysis methods like length-based attacks have been developed against these systems.
Abstract
Polycyclic groups are natural generalizations of cyclic groups but with more complicated algorithmic properties. They are finitely presented and the word, conjugacy, and isomorphism decision problems are all solvable in these groups. Moreover, the non-virtually nilpotent ones exhibit an exponential growth rate. These properties make them suitable for use in group-based cryptography, which was proposed in 2004 by Eick and Kahrobaei. Since then, many cryptosystems have been created that employ polycyclic groups. These include key exchanges such as non-commutative ElGamal, authentication schemes based on the twisted conjugacy problem, and secret sharing via the word problem. In response, heuristic and deterministic methods of cryptanalysis have been developed, including the length-based and linear decomposition attacks. Despite these efforts, there are classes of infinite polycyclic groups…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
