Detectors and cooling technology for direct spectroscopic biosignature characterization
Bernard J. Rauscher, Edgar R. Canavan, S.H. Moseley, John E. Sadleir,, and Thomas Stevenson

TL;DR
This paper reviews detector and cooling technologies essential for future space-based biosignature characterization, emphasizing the trade-offs between non-cryogenic and cryogenic detectors in terms of noise, cooling requirements, and performance.
Contribution
It provides an overview of potential detector and cooling options for biosignature characterization, analyzing their suitability and integration challenges for future space observatories.
Findings
Cryogenic detectors offer near quantum-limited performance.
Passive cooling compatible with non-cryogenic detectors reduces noise.
Cooling systems can be designed to meet vibration constraints of space telescopes.
Abstract
Direct spectroscopic biosignature characterization (hereafter "biosignature characterization") will be a major focus for future space observatories equipped with coronagraphs or starshades. Our aim in this article is to provide an introduction to potential detector and cooling technologies for biosignature characterization. We begin by reviewing the needs. These include nearly noiseless photon detection at flux levels as low as in the visible and near-IR. We then discuss potential areas for further testing and/or development to meet these needs using non-cryogenic detectors (EMCCD, HgCdTe array, HgCdTe APD array), and cryogenic single photon detectors (MKID arrays and TES microcalorimeter arrays). Non-cryogenic detectors are compatible with the passive cooling that is strongly preferred by coronagraphic missions, but would add…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
