Diagnosing shock temperature with NH$_3$ and H$_2$O profiles
A.I. G\'omez-Ruiz, C. Codella, S. Viti, I. Jim\'enez-Serra, G., Navarra, R. Bachiller, P. Caselli, A. Fuente, A. Gusdorf, B. Lefloch, A., Lorenzani, and B. Nisini

TL;DR
This study compares NH3 and H2O emission profiles in multiple outflows, finding that water consistently reaches higher velocities than ammonia, indicating that shock temperature influences their chemical behavior.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the velocity difference between NH3 and H2O is common in outflows, confirming the role of high-temperature chemistry in shock regions.
Findings
H2O emission reaches higher velocities than NH3 in all observed outflows.
The velocity difference is not unique to L1157-B1, but common across multiple outflows.
Gas temperature primarily determines ammonia's behavior in shock environments.
Abstract
In a previous study of the L1157 B1 shocked cavity, a comparison between NH(1-) and HO(1--1) transitions showed a striking difference in the profiles, with HO emitting at definitely higher velocities. This behaviour was explained as a result of the high-temperature gas-phase chemistry occurring in the postshock gas in the B1 cavity of this outflow. If the differences in behaviour between ammonia and water are indeed a consequence of the high gas temperatures reached during the passage of a shock, then one should find such differences to be ubiquitous among chemically rich outflows. In order to determine whether the difference in profiles observed between NH and HO is unique to L1157 or a common characteristic of chemically rich outflows, we have performed Herschel-HIFI observations of the NH(1-0) line at 572.5 GHz in a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
