Tycho Brahe, Abu Mashar, and the comet beyond Venus (ninth century A.D.)
Ralph Neuhaeuser (U Jena), Paul Kunitzsch (LMU Munich), Markus, Mugrauer, Daniela Luge (U Jena), Rob van Gent (U Utrecht)

TL;DR
This paper explores the historical observations of comets by Abu Mashar and Tycho Brahe, analyzing their conclusions about celestial objects beyond Earth, and clarifies the scientific understanding and misconceptions of the time.
Contribution
It provides a new translation and interpretation of Abu Mashar's original Arabic text, revealing his reasoning about comets beyond Venus and its influence on Tycho Brahe's conclusions.
Findings
Abu Mashar observed Venus in comet tails and concluded comets were beyond Venus.
Parts of Abu Mashar's reasoning about comets outside Earth's atmosphere are correct.
The paper clarifies historical misconceptions about comet observations in the ninth century.
Abstract
From his observations of the A.D. 1572 super-nova and the A.D. 1577 comet, Tycho Brahe concluded that such transient celestial objects are outside the Earth's atmosphere, and he quoted the 9th century A.D. Persian astrologer and astronomer Abu Mashar: Dixit Albumasar, Cometa supra Venerem visus fuit, i.e. that he had reported much earlier that comets were seen beyond Venus. However, even from a more detailed Latin translation, the observations and logic behind Abu Mashar's conclusion were not understandable. We present here the original Arabic text (MS Ankara, Saib 199) together with our translation and interpretation: Abu Mashar reported that he had observed Venus in (or projected onto) the tail of a comet and concluded that the comet was behind Venus, because he had observed the extinction of Venus due to the cometary tail to be negligible (light of Venus was unimpaired). He then…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
