Intelligent Biohybrid Neurotechnologies: Are They Really What They Claim?
Gabriella Panuccio, Marianna Semprini, Lorenzo Natale, Michela, Chiappalone

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the claims of intelligence in emerging biohybrid neurotechnologies for brain repair, questioning whether these devices truly demonstrate the level of sophistication and evolution they are attributed with.
Contribution
It provides a conceptual analysis of the terminology and claims surrounding biohybrid neurotechnologies, challenging the notion of their purported intelligence.
Findings
Highlights the ambiguity in defining intelligence in neurotechnologies
Questions the evolutionary claims made about biohybrid devices
Calls for clearer criteria to evaluate neurotechnology capabilities
Abstract
In the era of intelligent biohybrid neurotechnologies for brain repair, new fanciful terms are appearing in the scientific dictionary to define what has so far been unimaginable. As the emerging neurotechnologies are becoming increasingly polyhedral and sophisticated, should we talk about evolution and rank the intelligence of these devices?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
