Can Bioinformatics Be Considered as an Experimental Biological Science?
Olaf Ilzins, Raul Isea, Johan Hoebeke

TL;DR
This paper argues for recognizing bioinformatics as an experimental biological science by demonstrating how it generates testable hypotheses validated through laboratory experiments.
Contribution
It introduces three examples illustrating how bioinformatics can produce experimentally verifiable biological hypotheses, challenging its traditional view as merely a tool.
Findings
Bioinformatics can generate experimentally testable hypotheses.
Theoretical models in bioinformatics lead to verifiable experiments.
Bioinformatics bridges computational and experimental biology.
Abstract
The objective of this short report is to reconsider the subject of bioinformatics as just being a tool of experimental biological science. To do that, we introduce three examples to show how bioinformatics could be considered as an experimental science. These examples show how the development of theoretical biological models generates experimentally verifiable computer hypotheses, which necessarily must be validated by experiments in vitro or in vivo.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research · Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
