Is There Really "Retrocausation" in Time-Symmetric Approaches to Quantum Mechanics?
R. E. Kastner

TL;DR
This paper critically examines time-symmetric quantum theories, arguing they do not support retrocausation but instead depict a static, non-causal framework with an epistemic view of quantum states.
Contribution
It clarifies the ontological implications of time-symmetric quantum theories, challenging the notion of retrocausation and proposing a static, non-causal interpretation.
Findings
No dynamical causation applies to these theories
They depict a static picture of relationships among events
Quantum states are interpreted epistemically rather than ontologically
Abstract
Time-symmetric interpretations of quantum theory are often presented as featuring "retrocausal" effects in addition to the usual forward notion of causation. This paper examines the ontological implications of certain timesymmetric theories, and finds that no dynamical notion of causation applies to them, either forward or backward. It is concluded that such theories actually describe a static picture, in which the notion of causation is relegated to a descriptor of static relationships among events. In addition, these theories lead to an epistemic rather than ontologically referring, realist view of quantum states.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
