The probl\`eme des m\'enages revisited
Lefteris Kirousis, Georgios Kontogeorgiou

TL;DR
This paper offers a simpler, more elegant proof of the classic ménage problem formula, addressing gender bias issues in previous proofs and contributing to combinatorial mathematics.
Contribution
It provides an alternative, streamlined proof of the Touchard-Kaplansky formula that avoids gender bias present in earlier proofs.
Findings
New proof simplifies understanding of the problem
Addresses gender bias in combinatorial proofs
Enhances mathematical elegance and clarity
Abstract
We present an alternative proof to the Touchard-Kaplansky formula for the probl\`eme des m\'enages, which, we believe, is simpler than the extant ones and is in the spirit of the elegant original proof by Kaplansky (1943). About the latter proof, Bogart and Doyle (1986) argued that despite its cleverness, suffered from opting to give precedence to one of the genders for the couples involved (Bogart and Doyle supplied an elegant proof that avoided such gender-dependent bias).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Identities · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · History and Theory of Mathematics
