Asking photons where they have been in plain language
D. Sokolovski

TL;DR
This paper challenges a previous claim by Phys. Rev. Lett. that photons do not have continuous trajectories, demonstrating through standard quantum mechanics that such a conclusion is incorrect.
Contribution
The paper provides a straightforward analysis showing that the previous assertion about photon trajectories is false, clarifying misconceptions about photon paths.
Findings
The claim that photons lack continuous trajectories is incorrect.
Standard quantum mechanics supports the existence of continuous photon paths.
The analysis refutes previous interpretations about photon 'past' in quantum experiments.
Abstract
The authors of Phys.Rev.Lett. \textbf{111}, 240402 (2013) conclude that "the past of the photons is not represented by continuous trajectories". A simple analysis by standard quantum mechanics shows that this claim is false.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
