Critical comments on EEG sensor space dynamical connectivity analysis
Frederik van de Steen, Luca Faes, Esin Karahan, Jitkomut Songsiri,, Pedro Antonio Valdes Sosa, Daniele Marinazzo

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that EEG sensor space connectivity measures like Granger causality and DTF can produce spurious results due to volume conduction, emphasizing the need for source-level analysis or robust methods.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical and simulation-based critique of sensor space causal connectivity analysis, highlighting limitations and proposing best practices.
Findings
Sensor space connectivity measures can be spurious due to volume conduction.
Source-level analysis is necessary for accurate causal connectivity.
Mixing effects can also occur in source space, requiring robust methods.
Abstract
Many different analysis techniques have been developed and applied to EEG recordings that allow one to investigate how different brain areas interact. One particular class of methods, based on the linear parametric representation of multiple interacting time series, is widely used to study causal connectivity in the brain. However, the results obtained by these methods should be interpreted with great care. The goal of this paper is to show, both theoretically and using simulations, that results obtained by applying causal connectivity measures on the sensor (scalp) time series do not allow interpretation in terms of interacting brain sources. This is because 1) the channel locations cannot be seen as an approximation of a source's anatomical location and 2) spurious connectivity can occur between sensors. Although many measures of causal connectivity derived from EEG sensor time series…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
