Lorentz-violating type-II Dirac fermions in transition metal dichalcogenide PtTe$_2$
Mingzhe Yan, Huaqing Huang, Kenan Zhang, Eryin Wang, Wei Yao, Ke Deng,, Guoliang Wan, Hongyun Zhang, Masashi Arita, Haitao Yang, Zhe Sun, Hong Yao,, Yang Wu, Shoushan Fan, Wenhui Duan, Shuyun Zhou

TL;DR
This paper reports the first experimental evidence of Lorentz-violating type-II Dirac fermions in bulk PtTe$_2$, revealing strongly tilted Dirac cones and expanding the understanding of topological semimetals with novel physical properties.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental confirmation of type-II Dirac fermions in a bulk transition metal dichalcogenide, combining ARPES measurements and first-principles calculations.
Findings
Identification of strongly tilted Dirac cones in PtTe$_2$
Confirmation of PtTe$_2$ as a type-II Dirac semimetal
Evidence of Lorentz-violating Dirac fermions in a condensed matter system
Abstract
Topological semimetals have recently attracted extensive research interests as host materials to condensed matter physics counterparts of Dirac and Weyl fermions originally proposed in high energy physics. These fermions with linear dispersions near the Dirac or Weyl points obey Lorentz invariance, and the chiral anomaly leads to novel quantum phenomena such as negative magnetoresistance. The Lorentz invariance is, however, not necessarily respected in condensed matter physics, and thus Lorentz-violating type-II Dirac fermions with strongly tilted cones can be realized in topological semimetals. Here, we report the first experimental evidence of type-II Dirac fermions in bulk stoichiometric PtTe single crystal. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements and first-principles calculations reveal a pair of strongly tilted Dirac cones along the -A direction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
