Diffuse Galactic antimatter from faint thermonuclear supernovae in old stellar populations
Roland M. Crocker, Ashley J. Ruiter, Ivo R. Seitenzahl, Fiona H., Panther, Stuart Sim, Holger Baumgardt, Anais Moller, David M. Nataf, Lilia, Ferrario, J.J. Eldridge, Martin White, Brad E. Tucker, and Felix Aharonian

TL;DR
This paper proposes that faint thermonuclear supernovae from old stellar populations, specifically SN1991bg-like events, are the main source of galactic positrons, explaining observed signals and isotope abundances.
Contribution
It identifies a specific type of transient, SN1991bg-like supernovae, as the primary source of galactic positrons and isotope production, resolving long-standing source ambiguity.
Findings
SN1991bg-like supernovae produce enough $^{44}$Ti to account for positron signals.
The spatial distribution of these supernovae matches the positron annihilation morphology.
The $^{44}$Ti yield explains the solar system abundance of $^{44}$Ca.
Abstract
Our Galaxy hosts the annihilation of a few low-energy positrons every second. Radioactive isotopes capable of supplying such positrons are synthesised in stars, stellar remnants, and supernovae. For decades, however, there has been no positive identification of a main stellar positron source leading to suggestions that many positrons originate from exotic sources like the Galaxy's central super-massive black hole or dark matter annihilation. %, but such sources would not explain the recently-detected positron signal from the extended Galactic disk. Here we show that a single type of transient source, deriving from stellar populations of age 3-6 Gyr and yielding ~0.03 of the positron emitter Ti, can simultaneously explain the strength and morphology of the Galactic positron annihilation signal and the solar system abundance of the Ti decay product…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
