Minor Mergers or Progenitor Bias? The Stellar Ages of Small and Large Quenched Early-Type Galaxies
Martina Fagioli, C. Marcella Carollo, Alvio Renzini, Simon J. Lilly,, Masato Onodera, Sandro Tacchella

TL;DR
This study analyzes the stellar ages of quenched early-type galaxies to determine whether size evolution is driven by minor mergers or progenitor bias, using spectroscopic data from the zCOSMOS survey.
Contribution
It provides evidence that progenitor bias dominates size evolution below 10^11 solar masses, while dry mergers are significant above this mass, based on stellar age and abundance ratio analyses.
Findings
Younger stellar populations in large galaxies below 10^11 MSun support progenitor bias.
No age trend with size in galaxies above 10^11 MSun suggests dry mergers drive size growth.
Consistently high [alpha/Fe] ratios imply short formation timescales across the galaxy population.
Abstract
We investigate the origin of the evolution of the population-averaged size of quenched galaxies (QGs) through a spectroscopic analysis of their stellar ages. The two most favoured scenarios for this evolution are either the size growth of individual galaxies through a sequence of dry minor merger events, or the addition of larger, newly quenched galaxies to the pre-existing population (i.e., a progenitor bias effect). We use the 20k zCOSMOS-bright spectroscopic survey to select bona fide quiescent galaxies at 0.2<z<0.8. We stack their spectra in bins of redshift, stellar mass and size to compute stellar population parameters in these bins through fits to the rest-frame optical spectra and through Lick spectral indices. We confirm a change of behaviour in the size-age relation below and above the ~10^11 MSun stellar mass scale: In our 10.5 < log M*/MSun < 11 mass bin, over the entire…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
