Development of dual-polarization LEKIDs for CMB observations
Heather McCarrick, Maximilian H. Abitbol, Peter A.R. Ade, Peter Barry,, Sean Bryan, George Che, Peter Day, Simon Doyle, Daniel Flanigan, Bradley R., Johnson, Glenn Jones, Henry G. LeDuc, Michele Limon, Philip Mauskopf, Amber, Miller, Carole Tucker, and Jonas Zmuidzinas

TL;DR
This paper presents the design, fabrication, and initial testing of dual-polarization LEKID arrays optimized for CMB observations, demonstrating promising noise and responsivity performance for future cosmology experiments.
Contribution
It introduces dual-polarization LEKID arrays with two architectures and provides initial characterization data for their application in CMB studies.
Findings
Initial noise spectra and noise-equivalent temperature measurements
Responsivity levels suitable for CMB observations
Successful demonstration of dual-polarization detection in LEKIDs
Abstract
We discuss the design considerations and initial measurements from arrays of dual-polarization, lumped element kinetic inductance detectors (LEKIDs) nominally designed for cosmic microwave background (CMB) studies. The detectors are horn-coupled, and each array element contains two single-polarization LEKIDs, which are made from thin-film aluminum and optimized for a single spectral band centered on 150 GHz. We are developing two array architectures, one based on 160 micron thick silicon wafers and the other based on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers with a 30 micron thick device layer. The 20-element test arrays (40 LEKIDs) are characterized with both a linearly-polarized electronic millimeter wave source and a thermal source. We present initial measurements including the noise spectra, noise-equivalent temperature, and responsivity. We discuss future testing and further design…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
