The usability canary in the security coal mine: A cognitive framework for evaluation and design of usable authentication solutions
Brain Glass, Graeme Jenkinson, Yuqi Liu, M. Angela Sasse and, Frank Stajano

TL;DR
This paper introduces a cognitive framework to evaluate and design authentication methods that balance security with usability by modeling their impact on user productivity and satisfaction.
Contribution
It presents a novel framework based on cognitive psychology to predict user performance and satisfaction with authentication methods in context.
Findings
The model accurately predicted user performance and satisfaction in a mock airline check-in scenario.
Design experts' recommendations aligned with the model's predictions.
The framework supports holistic assessment of authentication usability in real-world contexts.
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, researchers have identified an increasing number of security mechanisms that are so unusable that the intended users either circumvent them or give up on a service rather than suffer the security. With hindsight, the reasons can be identified easily enough: either the security task itself is too cumbersome and/or time-consuming, or it creates high friction with the users` primary task. The aim of the research presented here is to equip designers who select and implement security mechanisms with a method for identifying the ``best fit`` security mechanism at the design stage. Since many usability problems have been identified with authentication, we focus on ``best fit`` authentication, and present a framework that allows security designers not only to model the workload associated with a particular authentication method, but more importantly to model it in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
